 |
 |
|
Master Plan for
Benton Park
Prepared by Saunders and Associates, December, 1993
Key Topics
1.
Background 2.
Mission Statement 3.
Existing Conditions 4.
Concept Plan 5.
Priorities and Cost
6. APPENDIX A: Existing
Tree Survey
7. APPENDIX B: Recommended
Plant List (coming soon)
8. APPENDIX C: Phase One
Planting - Budget
9. APPENDIX D: Color Scheme
for Community Building
1.
Background
Benton Park, now bordered by Arsenal Wyoming, Illinois and Jefferson
streets in St. Louis, was originally zoned as part of the St. Louis
Common by an Act of Congress in 1812. The Common was a tract of
grazing ground to be used by the cities’ first inhabitants. In 1842
the city designated the tract as “the St. Louis Cemetery,” and many
cholera victims were buried there as a result of epidemics during
the middle of the century. In 1865 and 1866 ordinances were passed
which relocated the graves and which established the cemetery area
as a public park to be called Benton Park in honor of Thomas Hart
Benton, a famous Missouri statesman.
To the east of Benton Park was a natural cave first used by Ezra
English, an early brewer as a place to store his malt beer. When
English’s brewery expanded, the caves were no longer adequate for
storage, and the caverns were used for raising mushrooms.
When the park was established, an artificial lake was created to
enhance the grounds. Yet the water from the lake often drained into
the nearby caverns. The problem was resolved by filling the leaking
creavesses with concrete. In 1888, Park Commissioner Richard Klemm
further altered the lake by ordering it filled to an average depth
of three and a half feet to avoid hazardously deep areas.
Early in the history of the park, E. Krausnick, horticulturist and
landscape gardener, was hired as superintendent. Under his expert
guidance, the park become one of the most beautiful and popular
resorts in the city, filled with rare trees, shrubs, and flowers. A
devastating tornado in 1896 destroyed many of the park’s trees. In
1882 the Hecker monument, a granite obelisk, was dedicated to
Friederich karl Hecker, a German revolutionary who served the Union
Army during the Civil War.
During the eight of Benton Park’s popularity, visitors could enjoy
boat rides on the lake and classical concerts at the bandstand for a
modest sum. Shortly after World War I, (however) there started a
noticeable decline in the beauty of the park which mirrored the
decline in the neighborhood – homes began to summer from
obsolescence. During the decades that followed, the park served its
purpose as a children’s play area and gathering place for the
elderly, but “the old grandeur was gone.”
In 1956 and 1957, Benton Park was rehabilitated under the 1955 bond
issue at a cost of $163,829. A “modern” playground was installed and
a community building was built on the site of the old bandstand.
Further decline of the park during the past few decades resulted in
vandalism and disrepair in the park’s facilities and a lost of more
than half of the park’s trees.
In 1985 the Benton Park Neighborhood was granted Federal Historical
District status. The recent revitalization of the neighborhood which
followed has been reflected in Park improvements including the
addition of tennis courts, the planting of evergreens throughout the
park and oaks along the Jefferson border, and (more recently) the
addition of an entry marker at the corner of Jefferson and Arsenal.
2. Mission Statement
The mission of the Benton Park Neighborhood Association is to
revitalize Benton Park as a reflection of and as a catalyst to the
revitalization of the Benton Park Neighborhood.
The mission of the Benton Park Beautification Committee (A task
force within the Neighborhood Association) is to administer and
implement the Park’s revitalization via an overall master plan.
The mission of the planning firm of Saunders & Associates, after
analysis of the site and the neighborhood, is to develop a master
plan which will guide the Park’s development and, thereby,
consolidate the efforts of well-intentioned people to work towards a
comprehensive goal.
3. Existing Conditions
Aside from the steady decline and loss of trees, the eastern two
thirds of the park’s 14 acres remains essentially as it was in the
1860’s – a very attractive Victorian park with curvilinear walkway
systems, pleasantly shaped lagoons, bridges and undulating
topography. The park is surrounded by neighborhood ball fields and
schoolyard playgrounds. Further, a community center at the southwest
corner of the park provides various indoor recreational facilities.
Each of the park’s street borders possess unique characteristics.
Jefferson Avenue, the west border, is a major urban thoroughfare.
However, a newly planted avenue of oaks has softened the street’s
noise and has created a pleasant western border for the park.
Arsenal Street to the north is also a busy street. There is little
landscaping on this border which unfortunately allows the noise and
visual excitement of this street to encroach upon the serenity of
the park (although the historic homes facing the park form a nice
visual backdrop). Wyoming Street to the south is shielded from the
park by a steep slope and relatively dense vegetation. Illinois
Street to the east is a quiet dead-end street of large Victorian
homes which contribute greatly to the park’s character.
Park maintenance is provided by the city’s Parks Department and
consists primarily of mowing lawns and emptying trash cans. However,
the park has difficulty maintaining adequate trash cans and benches
due to the preponderance of the original Victorian plan’s
physiographic features. Many of the existing drinking fountains are
inoperable. (even though the inner structure of the waterlines an
sewer lines to the pond are still in place) creating a stagnant
eyesore. In addition, much of the park’s walkways and facilities are
inaccessible to handicapped people.
Besides the tennis courts, the existing adult recreational
facilities – horseshoe pitches and shuffleboard courts – are
severely neglected. Yet, the modern playground area is relatively
well kempt. The community and restroom building overlooking the
round pond is terribly neglected, with all rooms locked at all times
and industrial strength fencing covering all window openings –
clearly not the intention of the building’s original designer.

General Problems:
 |
Erosion Control |
 |
General Cleanup and Fix-up |
 |
Repair Bridge Rails |
 |
Paint Existing Structures, Etc. |
 |
Need More coniferous Trees |
 |
Need Improved Passive Security |
 |
Need Activities/Structures to Promote use of Park
|
Potential Activities:
 |
Socials i.e. Ice Cream |
 |
Exhibits i.e. Arts and Crafts Fair |
 |
Block Parties/BBQ |
 |
Musical Gatherings |
 |
Reunions/ Receptions |
 |
Sports Tournaments |
 |
Paddle Boat Races |
 |
Remote Control Yaugts |
 |
Bocci Tournaments |
 |
Hacky Sack Contests |
 |
Frisbee Golf Contests |
 |
Rallies – Social and Political |
 |
Fishing (Pay for what you catch)
* Entry fees, rentals, etc. could produce income to alleviate
operating costs |
Improve Entry Areas By Degree of Importance – Typically
 |
Landscape |
 |
Structure |
 |
Lighting |
 |
Signage |
 |
Access per ADA
|
Point 2
 |
Improve building appearance to reflect the park
|
 |
Upgrade to meet ADA requirements
|
 |
More appropriate surface treatment
|
 |
Soften but improve security
|
Point 3
 |
Improve circulation |
Point 4
 |
Meet ADA access requirements
|
Point 5
 |
Provide appropriate structures to encourage people to use park
|
Point 6
 |
Needs additional trees and shrubs (improve sparse plantings)
|
Point 7
 |
Repair drinking fountains
|
Point 8
 |
More appropriate adult recreation
|
Point 9
 |
Add Benches |
 |
Add trash receptacles |
Point 10
 |
Improve lighting function and appearance |
 |
Coordinate light standards, fountains, receptacles, banners,
etc. to enhance theme of park experience |
Other notes on the analysis:
 |
Soften inappropriate hard edges
|
 |
Major Rehabilitation Under Utilized ( notes on north west
section - north of playground and east of lake) |
 |
Screen (park building to north)
|
 |
Repair
Fountain (notes on Southwestern side) |
 |
Preserve and Enhance (notes on East side of park)
|
 |
Architectural Blight (notes on west central –park building area)
|
4. Concept Plan
I Overall Concept
Benton Park was designed as a Victorian park – with undulating
contours and pictorial water features. The few relatively flat areas
in the park that exist were the result of 1950’s alternations which
included long rectilinear retaining walls). Further, the Benton Park
Neighborhood, a historic district, has a rich context of Victorian
architecture. For these reasons (and because there already exists
adequate recreational facilities in the immediate vicinity) , it is
the planner’s recommendation that the major concept of the master
plan be one of restoration.

In addition to restoration, another major thrust of the master plan
would be to enhance and increase the features of the park which
would increase the pedestrian activity and encourage greater
recreational use of the park. Because of its Victorian character,
the park is best suited to “passive” recreational activities –
walking, picnics, etc. The eastern two thirds of the park should
undergo relatively minor enhancements and major preservation efforts
(particularly landscaping). The western third of the park,
particularly around the community and rest room facility and
playground, would require a more major rehabilitation.
II Repair and Restoration
a. Landscape
The park needs a major implementation of plantings, including a full
spectrum of shade trees, evergreen trees, flowering trees, shrubs
and bedding plants. This implementation would need to be supported
and maintained by gardening groups in the neighborhood with a full
term care which would be beyond the scope of city-provided
maintenance. (The city would, however, provide water hydrants
necessary for irrigation systems). The continuing decline of
existing plants should be addressed as soon as possible. Entry
points to the park, in particular, should be enhanced with landscape
elements. Erosion control measures must also be taken.
Phase I – Phase I Landscape Restoration focuses on three areas: the
Round Pond, the North Lagoon, and the northwest corner entrance.

b. Hardscape
Repair and restoration to the park infrastructure and hardscape
include continued repair and maintenance of existing structures –
repair/replacement of handrails, patching and replacement of walks,
repairs and replacement of trash receptacles, drinking fountains,
and park benches. Of high priority is the alternation of existing
walks and facilities making them accessible to handicapped persons
in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Also
of high priority is the repair of the fountain in the Round Pond.
The importance of this improvement is that is would be a major
symbol of rebirth and restoration in the park and would thereby
encourage popular support for further restoration projects.
A phased enhancements of the community/restroom building should
begin with a programmatic examination of the building and its
function. More appropriate and aesthetic security features can be
utilized (eg. Use of Lexan coating instead of industrial fencing
presently protecting the windows). Further enhancement of the
building should include repainting of existing doors and trim to a
more historically appropriate color scheme. Also a roof structure
should be altered to exhibit a more historically appropriate design.
Further, modern lighting fixtures and standards should be replaced
with historic fixtures (Existing ornamental light standards have
been reclaimed in various parts of the city and have been stored for
future use).
III Improvements
Bandstand/Amphitheatre
The open valley north of the playground could be converted into a
bandstand and amphitheatre. A bandstand was one of the original
structures in the park. It would provide not only a site for concert
type activities, but provide a major three dimensional element to
enhance the part experience.
Picnic Shelter
There are currently no picnic shelters in the park – no place for
families or other groups to hold picnics during inclement weather. A
shelter would provide the setting for picnics and other gatherings.
In addition, a man-made structure would serve as a textural contract
to the strictly vegetative vertical elements (trees) in the park and
would help define its larger scaled spatial relationship. (The
shelter is shown on the map to be the south west between the lagoon
walkway and the intersection of the two paths)

New Path/Entrances
The perimeter circulation through the northwest part of the site
could be improved by adding a path which would connect to the
perimeter path of the south and eastern portions of the park. This
would also provide a biking/jogging trail and encourage greater
activity in the park. Addition entrance paths should be provided at
street intersections.
Hard surfaced Recreational Upgrade
The hard surfaced area to the southwest could benefit from more
contemporary forms of adult recreation – basketball, handball and/or
bocci ball courts in lieu of the existing shuffleboards and
horseshoes facilities.
Promenade
A promenade next to the existing community and restroom building
would enhance the straight line walkway connecting the western and
central portions of the site and provide an activity center for art
shows, pet shows, etc. The promenade would also provide easy access
to the community and restroom building, basketball/bocci/handball
courts, children’s play area , and amphitheatre.
Boat Rental/Storage
The structure beneath the bridge to the west of the lagoon could be
rehabilitated to be used as a concessions area and boat
rental/storage facility. The original park featured canoes and row
boats for rent. Such an activity would be appropriate to the park’s
character and would provide part-time employment for a
concessionaire either elderly or youthful. The storage could be
easily secured. Part of this structure could also be used for
concession of snacks and soft drinks as well as fishing bait and
tackle.
Lily Pond
Another element would be a lily pond at the west side of the bridge
over the boat rental facility. This would enhance not only the view
from the bridge but also from the amphitheatre.
5.
Priorities and Costs
| Improvement |
Budget Cost |
| |
|
| 1. Landscaping |
$20,000 - $50,000 |
| 2. General ADA Upgrade |
$10,000 - $20,000 |
| 3. Fountain Restoration |
$5,000 - $10,000 |
| 4. Building Upgrade |
$10,000 - $40,000 |
| 5. Amphitheatre/Bandstand |
$15,000 - $50,000 |
| 6. Picnic Shelter |
$5,000 - $20,000 |
| 7. New Paths / Entrances |
$5,000 - $10,000 |
| 8. Fountains,Benches,Containers |
$7,000 - $13,000 |
| 9. Hard Surfaced Recreations |
$5,000 - $10,000 |
| 10. Lighting |
$30,000 - $60,000 |
| 11. Promenade |
$10,000 - $15,000 |
| 12. Boat Rental / Storage |
$10,000 - $30,000 |
| 13. Lilly Pond |
$5,000 - $20,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$137,000 - $348,000 |
APPENDIX A: Existing Tree Survey
| # |
Name |
Size |
No. |
. |
# |
Name |
Size |
No. |
. |
# |
Name |
Size |
No. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
Ailanthus |
10" |
5 |
|
15 |
Hackberry |
8" |
2 |
|
28 |
Oak, Pin |
4" |
25 |
| |
|
12" |
1 |
|
|
|
12" |
1 |
|
|
|
26" |
1 |
| |
|
20" |
2 |
|
|
|
15" |
1 |
|
|
|
28" |
2 |
| 3 |
Ash |
4" |
1 |
|
|
|
16" |
1 |
|
16 |
Oak, Red |
8" |
1 |
| |
|
14" |
2 |
|
|
|
18" |
1 |
|
|
|
18" |
13 |
| 9 |
Catalpa |
8" |
3 |
|
|
|
20" |
4 |
|
|
|
20" |
1 |
| |
|
10" |
2 |
|
|
|
22" |
2 |
|
|
|
34" |
1 |
| |
|
12" |
1 |
|
|
|
24" |
3 |
|
29 |
Pine, White |
2" |
18 |
| |
|
15" |
1 |
|
1 |
Hawthorn |
4" |
1 |
|
|
|
12" |
11 |
| |
|
18" |
2 |
|
3 |
Linden, European |
5" |
1 |
|
16 |
Spruce |
6" |
2 |
| 1 |
Cottonwood |
30" |
1 |
|
|
|
8" |
1 |
|
|
|
8" |
9 |
| 18 |
Crabapple |
8" |
6 |
|
|
|
14" |
1 |
|
|
|
10" |
5 |
| |
|
10" |
9 |
|
1 |
Linden, American |
30" |
1 |
|
4 |
Sweet Gum |
8" |
1 |
| |
|
12" |
1 |
|
5 |
Locust, Black |
6" |
1 |
|
|
|
20" |
1 |
| |
|
15" |
2 |
|
|
|
7" |
1 |
|
|
|
25" |
1 |
| 19 |
Elm |
10" |
4 |
|
|
|
8" |
1 |
|
|
|
30" |
1 |
| |
|
12" |
3 |
|
|
|
12" |
2 |
|
55 |
Sycamore |
8" |
1 |
| |
|
15" |
3 |
|
5 |
Locust, Globe |
14" |
5 |
|
|
|
10" |
2 |
| |
|
22" |
3 |
|
4 |
Locust, Honey |
4" |
1 |
|
|
|
12" |
2 |
| |
|
24" |
3 |
|
|
|
8" |
3 |
|
|
|
14" |
2 |
| |
|
26" |
1 |
|
1 |
Magnolia, Saucer |
|
1 |
|
|
|
16" |
1 |
| |
|
28" |
1 |
|
4 |
Maple, Red |
2" |
3 |
|
|
|
18" |
23 |
| |
|
30" |
1 |
|
|
|
6" |
1 |
|
|
|
20" |
2 |
| 1 |
Elm, Siberian |
14" |
1 |
|
3 |
Maple, Silver |
8" |
1 |
|
|
|
22" |
2 |
| 7 |
Ginkgo |
6" |
1 |
|
|
|
12" |
2 |
|
|
|
24" |
3 |
| |
|
10" |
2 |
|
|
|
30" |
1 |
|
|
|
26" |
2 |
| |
|
15" |
1 |
|
11 |
Maple, Sugar |
4" |
2 |
|
|
|
28" |
2 |
| |
|
20" |
1 |
|
|
|
5" |
2 |
|
|
|
30" |
8 |
| |
|
22" |
1 |
|
|
|
8" |
2 |
|
|
|
32" |
3 |
| |
|
24" |
1 |
|
|
|
15" |
3 |
|
|
|
34" |
1 |
| 13 |
Golden Rain |
8" |
1 |
|
|
|
18" |
2 |
|
|
|
36" |
1 |
| |
|
10" |
2 |
|
7 |
Mulberry |
16" |
2 |
|
5 |
Tulip |
10" |
1 |
| |
|
12" |
5 |
|
|
|
18" |
1 |
|
|
|
18" |
1 |
| |
|
14" |
1 |
|
|
|
25" |
1 |
|
|
|
26" |
1 |
| |
|
18" |
3 |
|
|
|
30" |
3 |
|
|
|
28" |
1 |
| |
|
20" |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40" |
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Walnut |
18" |
1 |
APPENDIX B: Recommended Plant List
(coming soon)
APPENDIX C: Phase One Planting - Budget
| |
Trees |
|
|
| |
Shade |
Evergreen |
Flowering |
Shrubs |
Bedding |
|
Area
unit costs: |
$100 |
$100 |
$75 |
$30 |
$1/s.f |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| I
Round Pond Area |
3 |
5 |
7 |
45 |
1,000 |
| |
$300 |
$500 |
$525 |
$1,350 |
$1,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
$3,675 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| II
North Lagoon Area |
5 |
9 |
9 |
37 |
1,200 |
| |
$500 |
$900 |
$675 |
$1,110 |
$1,200 |
| |
|
|
|
|
$4,385 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| II
N.W. Entrance Area |
3 |
6 |
4 |
24 |
300 |
| |
$300 |
$600 |
$300 |
$720 |
$300 |
| |
|
|
|
|
$2,220 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
Project Cost: |
|
$10,280 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
PEP Funds: |
$5,000 |
|
| |
|
City of StL
matching Funds |
$5,280 |
|
APPENDIX D: Color Scheme for Community
Building
 |
Metal Trim
Pratt & Lambert #1462
"Hedge Green" - Effecto Enamel |
 |
Doors (not frames)
Pratt & Lambert #1882
"Pagoda Red" - Effecto Enamel |
 |
Soffits (ceilings)
Pratt & Lambert #1801
"Minuet" - Effecto Enamel |
The rest of the plan describes the recommended planting of trees and
bushes and the 1993 dollar cost for making the improvements and
plantings.
Last updated:
Friday, November 14, 2008
 |
|
 |

|

 |